Of
late, there have been reports that the Bhopal Municipal Corporation is going
top operationalise the Bus Rapid Transit System (BRTS) from the 1st
January 2013. A fiat seems to have been issued in this regard by the Municipal
Commissioner and the officials concerned are reported to be working overtime to
carry out the dictat. That the bus corridor and the roads for the normal
traffic are far from ready does not seem to concern the Commissioner. His
anxiety is to somehow commission the project. Perhaps there is pressure from
above and if there indeed is any, one can understand the reasons. The
completion of the project has been inordinately delayed. Approved in April 2006
the work on the project could not start before February 2009. Over the last
four years or so the Municipal Corporation has missed as many as four deadlines
for its completion.
The
ambitious JN National Urban Renewal Mission (JNNURM) under which the project is
being implemented was launched in 2005. Since then BRTSs have been commissioned
in New Delhi, Ahmedabad, Jaipur and Pune. While at many places these are under
construction, in many others they are still in planning stage. The Bhopal
System that is under-construction for around four years, however, does not
quite hold out an example to others for emulation.
The
initial mistake seems to have been to allot the project to the Municipal
Corporation for implementation. The Corporation, as is evident, has less than
modest capability. When it is not able to carry out its day to day civic
functions to the satisfaction of the people, to expect it to competently and
efficiently implement this massive project in time was futile. One can only
wonder at the wisdom of the state government in handing over the project to the
local body knowing full well its track record of all–round failure in rendering
civic services. Jaipur and Ahmedabad created special purpose vehicles (SPV) for
construction of their respective BRTSs and these were completed well in time.
They are now in the stage of planning for further extensions.
Ahmedabad BRTS |
Ahmedabad BRTS is
reported to be so good that it has elicited inquiries from several foreign
countries, especially from South-East Asia and Africa. It was developed by
Gujarat Infrastructure Development Board which entrusted the designing work to
the Centre of Environmental Planning & Technology University (CEPT). The
Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation, Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority and the
Gujarat government established Ahmedabad Janmarg Ltd, a special purpose vehicle
to execute the project. Incidentally, the CEPT has since been engaged by the MP
government to suggest measures for effective conservation of the Upper Lake.
Why it could not be engaged for designing the Bhopal BRTS is a question that needs
to be answered by the government.
The
Bhopal Citizens’ Forum had requested the state Chief Secretary many months ago
to constitute, in absence of a SPV, a fully empowered authority for planning
and overseeing the implementation of the Project as also for effective
deployment of both, financial and human resources. It was contended that such
an empowered body would be able to take prompt decisions and clear obstacles in
construction, wherever they occurred. This, however, was not agreed to and the
Municipal Corporation is carrying out the work with its lees than adequate
capability and acumen. The result is there for all to see. Many stretches of
the road are still incomplete. Of the two flyovers to be constructed in the
older portion of the town one is under construction, the other one is still in
the design stage. Even the Habibganj railway over-bridge is nowhere near
completion.
Unlike
other BRT systems in the country the one in Bhopal is to pass through the old
parts of the town where the roads are narrow and have no space for the six
lanes that are necessary for it. What, therefore, is being done is to push back
the walls of the government and semi-government properties as far as possible.
In regard to the private properties nothing much, however, can be done and
there are any number of them. Only time will tell whether taking the System
right through the narrow and congested roads of the old city was wise or not.
Another
mistake made in planning the system seems to have been in reckoning the width
of the roads on two sides of the corridor on the basis of the traffic volumes
of the middle of last decade. Since then the number of vehicles of all types on
the roads has increased manifold. The up and down carriageways for the ordinary
vehicular traffic are, therefore, going to be far too inadequate with the
constant addition of private and commercial vehicles on the roads. In an
interview the municipal officials admitted this fact. With their myopic vision
what they have done, therefore, is to impose a permanent handicap on the city’s
traffic on its busy arterial roads.
The
Municipal officials have now reportedly expressed their feeling that the BRTS (presumably
with its bus corridor) is a Western concept which has been imposed on this
country. Surely, at the time of planning they could have kept in mind the local
conditions. While there are still not very many buses plying in the city, the
corridor is going to remain under-utilised for many years, what with lack of
feeder services and absence of parking spaces near the stops. The main purpose
of the BRTS of nudging people from personalised transport to public transport
is, therefore, going to remain unfulfilled for quite some years, given the
snail’s pace at which the Municipal Corporation carries out its works.
In
the circumstances, one tends to feel that for the sake of ensuring smoother
traffic flows perhaps it would be worthwhile to do away with the corridor.
Three plus three lanes right through the corridor for up and down traffic
should be adequate provided its movement is strictly managed. In that event traffic
police will have to become more proactive in training, controlling and monitoring
the traffic and strictly dealing with traffic offenders. There are unlikely to
be bottlenecks and buses and other vehicles are likely to move at a reasonable
pace. Dismantling of the corridor would, surely, mean waste of the money already
spent. The Municipal Corporation should have no qualms about it, having wasted
lakhs on enlarging several rotaries and then again reducing their sizes. This
has gone on for years. But the wastage that is feared may in fact yield savings
by way eliminating wastage of fuel in vehicles moving on low gears or stuck in
jams or because of frequent stoppages at bus stops where traffic lights are
proposed to be put up for the passengers’ safe cross-over to the buses in the
corridor.
It
is not yet too late. The question of doing away with the corridor could still
be reconsidered. It seems it will be more beneficial than having a virtually
empty corridor with up and down carriageways on its sides chock-a-block with
vehicles.