Showing posts with label virat. Show all posts
Showing posts with label virat. Show all posts

Friday, March 3, 2017

Virat among the billionaires

http://www.bagchiblog.blogspot.com



News has just come of Virat Kohli, the captain of the Indian cricket team, signing an endorsement contract for a period of eight years for more than Rs. 100 crore with Puma, the German manufacturer of sports goods,. This has brought young Virat in the “Rs. 100 crore Club”. Among cricketers, he is perhaps the third player to cross the 100 crore mark with Sachin Tendulkar and Mahandra Singh Dhoni preceding him.

 But Virat has been a “crorepati” several times over even before he signed the Puma contract. He has been on the scene for quite some time and has acquitted himself very well ever since his debut in the national team. No wonder, brands have been chasing him and he has been signing product endorsement contracts that suit his persona. Slowly and surely he has developed an iconic status among the country’s cricket-crazy youth who never seem to get enough of him.

So, the air in the country is getting thick with news of crorepatis and aspiring crorepatis. For those of us who are now ancient, having been born in the first half of the last century, the talk of crores creates a disconcerting bewilderment. Having been born and brought up in the days of “rupees, annas and pies” a crore of rupees seemed so distant, so formidable. The school fees used to be paid in paises and in college it used to be a few odd rupees. Even that would be halved if and when two or more siblings would be in the same college. After post graduation getting a job fetching a salary from Rs. 300 to Rs. 500 would be considered creditable as it would be reckoned to be out of the ordinary.

 Parents would go looking for a groom for their daughters whose salary would be in four figures. The classified ads used to be littered with such ads. Nursing the ambition, the parents labored hard all their lives to bring up their daughters nurturing them to make them good enough for a four-figure-salaried groom. Then, even if one takes the Hindi movies of the late 1940s or early 1950s lakhpati, a man with a hundred thousand or more but with less than a crore, was what a businessman or an industrialist was known as. Beyond that, a crore, was perhaps unimaginable and none would seem to have ever bothered to attempt making a crore. Only a filthy rich or a decadent landlord or a corrupt and black-marketeering baniya could perhaps salt it away, if at all, and, if he managed to do that, he wouldn’t flinch from flaunting it in the midst of the surrounding abject poverty.

The by-and-large innocent society was seemingly administered a shock, as it were, with the advent of Indira Gandhi whose reign in 1960s and 1970s was known for its “briefcase” culture. Her ministers and even her younger son started playing around with mammoth amounts of cash. One remembers LN Mishra, the then Commerce Minister, who would get regular supplies of briefcases brimming over with cash,  and would use them for ascending channelization of their contents. The briefcases, would never be returned to their rightful owners. Corruption had become so rampant that everybody in politics was involved in it. Indira Gandhi’s supporters in the Parliament began attacking her saying she was sitting on a pile of black money. The era of collecting crores had effectively dawned, albeit, in illegitimate cash.

 High inflation was a natural corollary – high inflation breeding higher prices and still higher inflation, all the time shearing away the value of the rupee that used to be so precious once upon a time. Then in 1990s came the economic reforms, a change over from pseudo-socialism to pseudo-capitalism. Business and industry, nonetheless, flourished spawning many more crorepatis, few legit but more illegit.

To come back to cricketing billionaires, it is only now that the game of cricket has spawned a few billionaires. Earlier they used to be paid a pittance and even big names like Nawab Mansur Ali Khan Pataudi was paid a very meager allowance for a five-day test match. Those days the game was generally played for the love of it. Things changed drastically after its professionalization. Consequent on the acquisition of the distribution rights to TV channels, the Board of Control for Cricket in India became the richest cricketing organization in the world. While this shifted the centre of gravity of cricket from London to Mumbai, the ever-flowing cash enabled it to pay handsome retainer fees in a graded manner to cricketers of various levels in the country. Thus there are many who have made a few crores over the last few years even without signing mouth-watering endorsements. Then, of course, the Indian Premier League (IPL) brought a windfall for them.

Cricket is an area where new-age crorepatis jostle around the stadia. The other area is the IT and Management fields where virtually every person who has come out of IITs or IIMs is a crorepati. They are so because of their brains which fetched them jaw-dropping packages in placements right in the institutes where they undertook their courses. The film industry is another one where, whether you deliver box-office hits or not, you get paid lavishly to boost your finances to make you a crorepati. Once you put across a box-office hit you, kind of, hit the jackpot. Multi-crorepatis in the film industry are numerous who lead a fabled life with luxury homes in India and/or abroad and stables crammed with luxury or high-end cars.

Businesses and industry, of course, have their respective shares of billionaires but, generally, they keep their financial information under wraps for fear of the tax-man. Among the businessmen and industrialists only 97 super-wealthy were reported by the Wall Street Journal in 2015. In an economy that boasts of being worth more than $ 2 trillion the number of declared billionaires would seem to be laughable. None knows who is at fault.

Likewise, politics is another ‘industry’ that breeds every five years a large number of super rich. Apart from the political movers and shakers, a large majority of legislators in states and at the Centre are crorepatis. It is not that their salaries and perks that make them so; most of them are corrupt and find myriad ways of accumulating illegal wealth. Even the meanest politician in a municipal corporation finds ways that facilely lead him to billions. Most of it is kept unaccounted to be used at the time of elections to bribe voters in exchange for votes.

India has come a long way from those modest days of early 20th century when it had a fat layer of hopelessly poor, a thin layer of middle classes and a micro-fine layer of rich and well-to-do. Today, on the other hand, though tax-paying crorepatis are reported to be only 18500 there are many more (excluding sporting and professional billionaires) who operate under the radars refusing to be recognized as crorepatis. While poor have shrunk in numbers the middle-classes have inflated.

No wonder lifestyles have changed and the market has upgraded itself to meet the demands of the rapidly generated billions. While Big B owns four bungalows in Mumbai’s costly land and gifts away a Bentley as a birthday gift to his son, others go for flats worth multi-crores in London’s Kensington or Dubai’s Palm Jumeirah or those churned out by the likes of Lodha. Likewise, while Lamborghinis and Rolls Royces adorn the garages of super-rich, Mercedes and Audis have become passe for our new-breed fat cats.

27th Frbruary 2017



Saturday, April 4, 2015

Crazy Indian cricket fans blame Anushka for the lost Semi Final



Australian bowler Mitchell Johnson exults after takeing Kohli's wicket
Anushka Sharma, the producer and female lead of the film "NH 10", is more in the news these days for her presence in the stands of the Sydney Cricket Ground on the day India lost to Australia in the Semi Final of the ICC Cricket World Cup 2015 than for her film that was generally very well received by film critics. She has been held responsible for the very dismal performance of the key Indian batsman Virat Kohli. The twitterati have been very active about it and some of the tweets went beyond the limits of decency. Even the members of a state legislative assembly blamed her for Kohli’s poor performance which, according to them, led to India’s defeat in the semi final depriving India of the World Cup. Thankfully, the team members have stood by Virat, as also his skipper and the Director of the Indian team Ravi Shastri. The latter, in a column, backed Virat and asserted that Anushka had nothing to do with his dismissal and, therefore, could not be held responsible for it in any way.

In India cricket is considered a kind of a religion. Vast numbers of Indians have two major obsessions – Bollywood and cricket and they pursue both of them avidly. That is, of course, something great for the team. The players are idolized and millions of words are written on them in the newspapers of every Indian language and feature programmes and talk shows are held in English and Hindi TV channels. Enthusiasts crowd into the stands for every international match, regardless of its importance and quality of the opposition and millions of others watch the matches on TV. Cricket lovers of India, by their keen interest in the game, have made India a very powerful country in the cricketing world. Actually, because of this massive support for the game the centre of gravity of Cricket administration shifted eastwards from its original base in London.

The support from home crowd is fine but the kind of fanatic support that we see is not desirable; it leads to utter disappointment leading to curses for the team, abusive conduct against players if the contest does not go according to the supporters’ expectations. A hunt then goes on for a peg from which to hang the person whom the unthinking spectators or TV viewing audience consider responsible for the adverse result. In this case they found two individuals: Virat Kohli and, more importantly, his girl friend Anushka Sharma.

Most of the supporters are laymen as far as cricket is concerned, unaware of its technicalities. They only feel happy when the home team scores runs, preferably in sixes or in fours. They roar in support when the opposition bowlers come in for a bit of hiding or when it loses wickets. With the belief that the home team should always win, they go wild when it actually does so. And yet, most of them are ignorant of the game’s niceties and finer points.

Many of them would not have ever held a bat in hand, leave alone standing at the crease facing a pace bowler. And yet, there has been a spate of criticism, sometimes very abusive and filthy with expletives, in Twitter against Virat Kohli who, batting at No.3, scored four centuries facing all the world-renowned speedsters in the recent 5-Test series against Australia on their fast-paced wickets. The crowd does not know that when a hard and solid cricket ball made of cork and leather weighing almost one-fifth of a kilo is hurled at the batsman over the 22 yards of the pitch at a speed of 140 to 150 kilometres an hour he hardly gets a fraction of a second to judge its speed, the place it would pitch in front or on either side of him and the kind of manipulations the bowler subjected the ball to and then to select a shot. What is more, the pace at which the ball is delivered, its direction and the manipulations to make it swing either way are all varied with every ball to induce the batsman to make mistakes. Hence mis-judgments and mis-timings are seen often enough, sometimes these are harmless and at times they are fatal for the batsman.

It is certainly hazardous to face the speedsters in cricket. Their deliveries zip across those 22 yards and before one count two the ball, if not connected with the bat, would be in the hands of the
Anushka and Virat
wicket-keeper standing far behind the stumps. Not many months ago a young up-and-coming Australian cricketer, Phil Hughes, lost his life after being struck on his helmeted head by a fast rising delivery. That Kohli faced them or even faster deliveries with aplomb all through the test series against the Australians speaks much about his skills, technical acumen and quality of his batsmanship. This wouldn’t have been possible without years of hard work on the nets and gyms with dedication, grit and determination to do well for India.

What happened at the semi final in Sydney was a matter of mis-judgment. The ball seemingly rose more than what Kohli expected and having committed to a stroke he couldn’t leave the ball alone and it took the upper edge of his bat only to balloon up to be held by the wicket keeper. Kohli cannot be blamed for it one bit as that happens in the game, and much less Anushka, who herself must have been appalled at the turn of events. The spectators and TV audiences should not get carried away and blame everyone in what, after all, is only a game. They must take losses in their stride instead of causing hurt to numerous people, especially those who have distinguished themselves in their respective fields.

_____________
Photos: from the internet
    

DISAPPEARING FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION

http://www.bagchiblog.blogspot.com Rama Chandra Guha, free-thinker, author and historian Ram Chandra Guha, a free-thinker, author and...