http://wwwbagchiblog.blogspot.com
In natural habitat |
People
like us who are uninitiated and unversed in matters relating eco-system
services rendered by tiger reserves could not have imagined that a detailed
study as conducted by an Indo-Australian team would throw up such astounding results
in regard to the benefits that accrue by saving tigers in their natural
habitat. The Indo-Australian study team was headed by the distinguished
professor Dr. Madhu Verma who is in the faculty of the renowned Indian
Institute of Forest Management located in Bhopal. Perhaps the babus who work the environment or
wildlife wings of various governments too would have been unaware of the facts
that have come to light now as a result of the study.
Yes, we knew that saving tigers would mean
saving forests and thereby protecting the environment and bio-diversity. Wherever
forests have been cleared the tigers too have disappeared from there. No
wonder, the numbers of tigers have fallen to 2000-odd in 2014 from around 40000
at the beginning of the last century. There was massive cutting down of forests
during the last century after independence to create farmlands in order to cope
with the prevailing food shortages. Perhaps the Himalayan terais, the happy hunting ground of Jim Corbett, were the worst
sufferers. With the disappearance of terai forests, tigers too disappeared
barring in the sanctuaries that were created later for them. Similar efforts to
bring large tracts of forests under the plough in the south, too, sounded the
death knell for tigers, particularly in the Western Ghats, except in small
pockets.
Unfortunately, earlier there was very little concern
for environment and wildlife in the functioning of the governments. Later, when
the precipitous fall was observed in tiger numbers it was Mrs. Indira Gandhi
who launched the Project tiger in a bid to save whatever numbers possible.
Thanks to the Project, the numbers rose from a low of around 1100 to the
2000-odd tigers that are now confined within several forested reserves that
have been created for them.
Even
these are frequently under threat from poachers who make a large amount of
money from its various body parts. It used to be said that a dead tiger is more
valuable than the ones that prowl around the forests. But obviously, as it has
now emerged from the new research, the tiger is far more valuable when alive
than when it is dead.
The
other threat it faces is from governments’ plans for development. Jairam
Ramesh, an MIT-trained politician, had proposed when he was Minister of
Environment, “go” and “no-go” areas for developmental activities in forested
lands. Certain thick and pristine forests that were lush with vegetation and
brimming over with wildlife were marked by him as “no go” forests where in no
case, as against the “go” areas, land could be allotted for developmental
activities. Because of his stiff opposition to exploiting forest lands for
development various proposals for mining and industry suffered delay. The
government of Manmohan Singh, an acclaimed economist, curiously found Ramesh’s
continuance as untenable and he was moved out of the Environment Ministry. And,
soon the government dismantled the concept of “no-go” areas in the interest of the
development lobby.
It is the tiger’s misfortune that the forests
in which he roams about are rich in minerals, especially coal, that are deeply
embedded underneath – all the goodies that create wealth. Every government
covets them for that dreadful word “development”. Contextually, therefore, the
Indo-Australian study for valuation of the tiger and the eco-system services its
reserves render is timely and propitious. Tigers’ habitat is under constant
threat, humans being self-willed and self-inclined in this Anthropocene Epoch
think of nothing else except their own well-being. Hence, unless monetary
values are attached to the tangible and intangible benefits offered by
preservation of the tiger and his habitat the authorities may never wake up to
the need to hold them dear and preserve them for the community’s well-being.
In
early 2015 a report of another study of economic valuation of six tiger
reserves conducted by the Indian Institute of Forest Management revealed that these
reserves were worth 1,49, 000 crore (US
$93 billion app. at current rate of exchange) but generate only 5% annually of
what they are worth. The tiger reserves surveyed were Corbett, Kanha,
Kaziranga, Periyar, Ranthambore and Sunderbans. While calculating the economic value
the experts took into account the range of their eco-system services which
included, inter alia, water provisioning, gene pool protection, carbon storage
and sequestration. The basic idea of the study seems to have been to encourage
the governments to enhance their investments in such forests to ensure the
well-being of people by harvesting the benefits of their eco-system services.
The
latest research, on the other hand, seems to have been focused on the economic
value of a tiger in its natural habitat. The same reserves were taken up for
the study but the focus was on the value of each tiger. The Indo-Australian
team has come up with a finding that is earth-shattering in at least in one way
– that of the values that have been estimated for tiger.
They have calculated that saving two tigers
gives more value than the cost of India’s Mangalayan Mission (Mars Mission). While the Mission
cost Rs. 450 crore (app. $70 billion) saving two tigers gives a capital benefit
of Rs. 520 crore (a little more than $80 billion). As India is home to 2226
adult tigers (according to 2014 tiger census) the capital benefit for country
would be Rs. 5.7 lakh crore – an astronomical sum.
According
to them, therefore, saving tigers makes good economic sense. The six tiger
reserves that they took up for study gives the country a secure capital of $230
billion and we have 50 such reserves that will give an astronomical value in
stock capital for the country. All this capital flows out of the eco-system
services that the tigers and the reserves they roam around in render. Yet, as
Mrs. Madhu Verma, the leader of the team said, “We still do not have adequate
information or understanding of eco-systems, all the species and the various
ways in which these enhance human well-being that we can estimate a value for
each of them”. The embedded meaning is, therefore, un-assessed stock value
could take it much higher than what has been estimated.
Mrs
Madhu Verma, perhaps, rightly says that “Ignorance of such values influences
public policies decisions including investments and funding that may impact
their protection status with serious implications on human well-being”. The
study, thus, tried to give a huge nudge to the government of India to allocate
more funds for the tiger reserves to ensure healthy eco-systems in them so that
flora and fauna prosper and multiply therein.
It has also been indicated that only 2.3% of
the geographical area of the country is covered by the tiger reserves. Perhaps,
instead of slicing away parts of these forests for developmental purposes like
the Ken-Betwa Rivers "inter-linking" project, there is need of increasing the area
under such forests to enhance the gains for the countrymen from their tangible
and intangible benefits.
Hopefully,
the government at the national level will pay enough heed to the results of
this study and initiate appropriate action for more investments in tiger
reserves for their better management. Let this study not be shelved to gather
dust in the record rooms of the ministry concerned, like what happened with
Mrs. Verma’s report on economic valuation of the Upper Lake of Bhopal conducted
under the aegis of the World Bank around a couple of decades ago. Had the
report been acted upon seriously, perhaps, the Lake would not have come to such
a sorry pass.
22nd
July 2017