http://www.bagchiblog.blogspot.com
|
Gauri Lankesh |
Gauri
Lankesh’s killing has created a great stir in the media. Somebody has described
the killing as the “Sword” winning over the “Pen”. From what appears on the
surface it might seem true that an array of free-thinkers, including Lankesh,
have been killed by unknown assailants, generally presumed to be belonging to
the Hindu extreme right. There is, though, no convincing evidence against any
organization of the extreme right. The Rightists have been blamed for the
killing only by surmises as the individuals killed were of Leftist orientation.
Whether these individuals were really Leftists is also doubtful as liberal
thinkers expound opinions that could more frequently verge on Leftist thoughts
without the propounders being hard core leftists.
Be
that as it may, one still tends to feel that the “Sword” can never be mightier
than the “Pen” – not in this day and age. The 21st Century is not
the time when practitioners of swordsmanship are likely to win over those who
have intellect and can facilely wield their pen to put across their enlightened
thoughts and opinions. The “Sword” can have a few successes here and there but
ultimately it is the human genius that would take mankind forward.
Civilisational progress or cultural advancement cannot be checkmated by
violence. It has not happened in the past and it is not going to happen in the
future.
So,
whoever or whichever organisation is behind the killings seems to have lost its
bearings. One wonders whether they are afraid of the impact that these liberals
could have on their clientele. Kalburgi, Dabholkar and Pansare, the three other
victims of unknown assailants, had a very small area of influence. They were
largely unknown up in the north. They hit the headlines only on being shot down
otherwise many had never heard of them. They don’t seem to have figured in any
of the intellectual or liberal discourses. They might have had their own
respective circles and might have written books but those had very limited
circulation. And, yet they were gunned down.
Likewise,
take for instance Gauri Lankesh; she was an editor of only a privately-run
tabloid – not a newspaper of repute, just a mere tabloid published in the local
language and one that used to come out only weekly. Her opinions expressed in
it would have circulated not beyond the four corners of Karnataka and, there
too, among those who had liberal or, one might even accept, Leftist
orientation. The readership would not have been in millions as it is on record
that Gauri’ Patrike was not as popular as that of her father. Yet she had
identified herself with the problems of Dalits and minorities and was anti-casteist
associating herself with movements such as those opposed superstitions. Above
all, she was a journalist who campaigned for justice and also, perhaps, for
rational thought and action.
And, though she was a transplant from Delhi
after her father’s death and was not quite well versed in Kannada language
journalism she seemed to have been very effective in her opinions that used to
be frank, forthright and unbiased, loaded with facts and truth. Despite the
falling ethical standards, more so in Karnataka, people lapped up her writings.
Quite clearly, in these days of paid and fake news there is still space for
independent and unbiased journalism, howsoever minuscule it might be.
Surprisingly, those who arranged to have her killed were afraid of ‘corruption’
of the minds of these small numbers of people.
Speculations
were rife about the affiliations of the killers. According to a theory, the
killer could be one of the Maoists as Gauri was successful in bringing over
some Maoists into the mainstream. The Maoists were presumably afraid such a
process could denude their cadres and weaken their outfit to fight for their
cause, whatever it is. They, however, accused the Hindu right extremists for
this supposedly false propaganda. Their outfit had recently declared in a press
statement that they had nothing to do with Gauri Lankesh and they had no reason
to kill her. Innocence of the Maoists, nonetheless, is yet to be proved.
On
the other hand the investigating agencies have come to the conclusion that the
gun used to kill Gauri was similar to the ones that were used to shoot down
other rationalists Dabholkar, Pansare and Kalburgi. Evidently it is one and the
same individual or organization which eliminated all the four rationalists. The
finger of suspicion, therefore, points towards the Hindu extreme right as the
rationalists were all opposed to the undesirable and obscurantist practices
observed by the Conservative Hindus.
What was Govind
Pansare like? He was a member of the Communist Party of India – a more tempered
Left party than CPI (M) or CPI (ML). He used to encourage inter-caste marriages
and fought against obscurantist practices of Hindus. Likewise, Narendra
Dabholkar, too, was against such practices. He was a qualified medical doctor
but he also used to run an organization against blind faith, belief in miracles
and obscurantist practices of Hindus. He, too, was against the caste system and
promoted equality in society that included the Dalits He also worked as an
office-bearer of the Federation of Indian Rationalist Associations.
MM
Kalburgi, third of the victims of unknown assailants, was a highly educated man
with a PhD in Kannada. He was a prolific writer and wrote tens of scholarly books.
Obviously, for his scholarship he was appointed the Vice Chancellor of Kannada University
in Hampi. He was a Lingayat, a caste that dominates the politics of Karnataka;
but he was a progressive Lingayat. He fell afoul of the Lingayat community as
he made some unpleasant comments against Basava, a 12th Century
philosophers revered by the community. Besides, he had scant respect for Hindu
idols which also did not please the staunch Hindus.
All
the three as well as Lankesh, though Hindus, had a perspective of Hinduism that
wasn’t quite in sync with the perceptions of common men, unthinking, unlettered,
and a somewhat begotted lot as they are. Rationalists have always had a tough
time down the ages and in numerous cases, starting from Socrates, had to pay
with their lives for their rational and scientific beliefs.
It must, however, be asserted that
rationalists and free-thinkers are always ahead of the contemporary world and,
hence, are derided. But, mostly what they said yesterday could come about today
in the midst of society with all the societal sanctions.
If
it is the Hindu Right that has eliminated these four forward-looking people,
one can only say that their action would not achieve whatever they were after.
In fact, their act will strengthen the rationalist movement and many of the
Hindu beliefs may undergo a change in not too distant future. Already, people
are restive and there is a growing feeling amongst them many of the features of
their religion need to change pushing the Hindu clergy into a minority. One
more thing has to be appreciated. For more than a thousand years Hinduism faced
the Islamic sword of the Mughals and the bullets of the British but it came out
unscathed and, perhaps, is flourishing like never before with all its benign
and malign features.
If
such massive powers could not subdue Hinduism it is very unlikely that a few
rationalists would be able to make a dent on it. But, surely their sacrifices
would not go in vain. Hinduism will certainly change in this era of Science and
Technology and will assume a more rational visage whether the suspected
sinister Hindu groups like it or not.
Photo from internet
18th
September 2017