http://www.bagchiblog.blogspot.com
Planting
spruce for “Future Library”
It was in the news recently that Oslo in Norway is going to grow trees for
books that
might be printed a hundred years from now. One thousand spruce saplings are
being planted in a forest outside Oslo. Whenever an author produces a
manuscript it would go into a time capsule kept in an Oslo library to be read
by none. Only in 2114 “the trees and text will be finally turned into a book”.
So, whatever Margaret Atwood, poetess and novelist, produces henceforth will
all go into the capsule, only to be published in the next century.
A spruce tree |
Katie
Paterson, a 36 year-old European artist initiated the “Future Library” project
for spruce trees to be grown in Norway’s Nordmarka forest for the books to be
printed in the next century. It is she who proposed that Margaret Atwood’s book
would be the first to be capsuled for the Future Library. Another popular
author David Mitchell has also handed over his manuscript to be published a
hundred years from now. Mitchell is reported to have said "It's trees, it's books, it's a circle, it's pulp, it's
organic matter turning into this stuff [paper] …and then words get printed on
them. I love that”
Katie Paterson appears to be a very hopeful person. She seems to
believe that a century from now forests will still be there and there will be
still people who would like to hold a book printed on paper in their hands
despite the upgrades in technology taking place seemingly at supersonic speed.
She is also up to creating a press which would print these books and
arrangements are being made to ensure that it remains fit enough to roll out
the preserved manuscripts on paper. A periodical maintenance job is being
arranged. This is nothing but a strong belief in human behavior and a way of
life which, she hopes, will persist even a hundred years hence. According to
Paterson, Future Library believes “there will be a forest, a book and a reader
in 100 years. The choices of this generation will shape the centuries to come,
perhaps in an unprecedented way.”
The project has environmental undertones. It seeks to protect at
least 1000 spruce trees for a hundred years in an area where the trees may come
under the axe sooner than later. Norway is happily placed in respect of forests
which cover about 37% of its land area but more than 23% of it harvested for
commercial purposes.
Paterson’s is undoubtedly an unique project and one can only hope
that her claims that a century away people will be affected by the choices made
by the current generation come true.
Penalising for
wrong parking
The
other day a Hindi daily reported that a fine of Rs. 8000/- was imposed on a car
owner for improper parking in London. It
seems a wealthy commuter arrived in his BMW near Mayfair or some such place in
the Hyde Park area and did not care to keep his car within the space indicated
for parking. His car was outside the line drawn for the purpose by a mere six
inches or so but the London Police charged him for violation of the laws and
fined him Rs. 8000/-. For us in India it looks an incredibly huge amount for a
minor violation but in British currency it must have been around 100 pounds.
Though 100 Pounds would be chicken feed for a man running around in a BMW in
London – a very expensive place – yet it is, to my mind, a reasonably big
amount. One could even call it a heavy penalty.
Because
of such stiff penalties for even minor offences one would seldom come across a
vehicle parked casually without any regard to the laws as in any city of India.
While in the developed countries there is what is called governance, and that
too very effective, here we have none of that, mostly because of attitudes of
our politicians who nurse their voters any which way, including by interfering
with the policing work for all kinds of violations – even relating to
violations of traffic rules. A local minister told as much to a representative
team of the Bhopal Citizens’ Forum. He brazenly said if any of his constituents
sought his help when in trouble with the Police he would certainly intervene
regardless of whether the violator was right or wrong.
No
wonder the streets of London or, for that matter, any European city one
wouldn’t find encroachments on the roads or pavements. If one stood on a
pavement in a street corner one would see all around roads and footpaths free
of kiosks or push-carts. However, where permitted, pavements are used for
outdoor cafetarias/restaurants and not for kiosks or hawkers. In Vienna I
remember to have seen kiosks built by the local body well away from the
Ringstrasse – a road where there is heavy traffic of locals as well as of
tourists. We even had pizzas off these kiosks cooked by an Italian.
We
in India are, however, very ‘tolerant’ – yes, very tolerant of all kinds of
violations, particularly of civic laws. We have all the paraphernalia for
enforcement of these laws but somehow these cannot be enforced largely because
of vested interests and use of political influence, sometimes even of the
lowest level. Somehow all the powers have gravitated towards the elected
political executive and the real enforcers have been left twiddling their thumbs.
Recent instances of attempts to remove illegal kiosks from near MP Nagar had to
be given up because of pressure of MLAs and municipal councilors.
Hence one can never find the same civic
discipline as one finds in the developed countries of the world. Here what is
needed is change of attitudes, especially of the political class. That,
however, may take an eternity.
11th June 2017
*Foto of spruce tree from internet
No comments:
Post a Comment