http://www.bagchiblog.blogspot.com
Speedster Mohammed Shami with his skipper Virat Kohli |
India
won the third Cricket Test against South Africa by 63 runs at Johannesburg. Having
lost two earlier Tests, India has avoided a white-wash by winning this Test.
The victory at Johannesburg, therefore is significant.
What, however, is more significant is that not
a ball was bowled by any Indian spinner. In fact, with a clear swing away from
tradition, not even a single spinner was included in the team. It was the
wicket at Johannesburg that induced this highly unusual decision. Besides, as
the cricket commentator Harsha Bhogle said after the match, Virat Kohli, the
skipper, has a liking for pace. And, pace it was right through and twenty South
African wickets were shared by the five Indian pace men in the Test.
To
be able to field five pacers all at one time in the same test is something
which is remarkable for Indian cricket. It has most of the time been
handicapped for want of raw pace. What we mostly have been nurturing was medium
pacers barring the interlude provided by Kapil Dev in the 1980s. Kapil was a
genuine pacer and became available to the Indian team after a very long gap.
The
gap commenced from the 1930s when Mohammed Nissar and Amar Singh were lost to
Indian cricket. Thoroughbred pacers, this duo could make life miserable for
even the English cricketers in their home grounds. After the eclipse of that
duo what we had was a long line of medium pacers. The handsome and debonair Fazal
Mahmood, who too could generate genuine pace, migrated to Pakistan leaving the
pace department to Lala Amarnath, Dattu Phadkar and CR Rangachari – all, at
best, medium pacers.
The
intervening three or four decades were infertile in so far as appearance of a
genuine pacer was concerned. None, perhaps, knows the reasons. Maybe, most of
the players did not have the physique and strength to sustain long spells of
fast bowling in tests, the only format that cricket was played in those days.
Perhaps, the over-dependence on spinners, too, prevented from pitches being
made that were conducive to pace bowling. No wonder, during this period India
produced some distinguished, world-class spinners for whom the Indian pitches
used to be tailor-made. While touring teams made Indian teams miserable with
their pace attack, their batsmen were troubled no end by the guile of Indian
spin bowlers. They would use everything - flight, turn, bounce, drift and dip –
to confound the batsmen.
With
the appearance of Kapil Dev in the late 1970s India saw for the first time in
many decades a genuine ‘quicky’ who could deliver fast balls and also take
wickets. His out-swingers were lethal and got him many batsmen of repute. What
he used to miss was genuine pace support. Most of his associates in the fast
bowling department of the team were medium pacers, barring, perhaps, Chetan Sharma
who unfortunately did not last for long. Others who were playing along with him,
like Mohinder Amarnath, Roger Binny, Manoj Prabhakar, Madan Lal or Ajit Agarkar,
were all medium pacers. To that extent the Indian pace attack has always been
blunted – regardless of the histrionics with the ball by Kapil Dev. Only
Javagal Srinath did fill for a while the void that was becoming far too disconcerting.
Srinath
was one of the products of MRF Pace Foundation where he was guided by none
other than Dennis Lilly. Late in the 1980s a rich cricket buff thought of doing
something for the country’s deficiency in pace bowling. He put his company’s
money creating facilities for nursing potential Indian pace men towards making
them world-class pacers with the help of outstanding international pace men. His
MRF Foundation got Dennis Lilly to do the honours of guiding and coaching young
Indians who had the potential to come good in the tough and demanding five-day
tests.
Apart
from Srinath the Foundation produced several winners like Zaheer Khan, Ishant
Sharma, Bhuwaneshwar Kumar, etc. With the creation of an environment for fast
bowling and improvement of pitches that support quick bowlers large numbers of
youngsters have taken to fast bowling. Off and on one hears some names that
have done well in knocking off established batsmen with sheer pace. A number of
young men like Jaydev Unnadkat, Shardul Thakur, Basil Thampi, Kamlesh Nagarkoti,
etc are waiting in the wings for opportunities to perform. Until they get into
action against foreign teams they would need to be nursed carefully to obviate
the possibilities of frequent injuries that fast bowlers generally are prone to.
The
significance of pacers coming good at Johannesburg should not, therefore, be
lost on the cricket-loving public in India. Among the pacers who played in
Johannesburg there were four who were in the team to form the nucleus of the
pace attack. They were all hurling the ball constantly at 140 kmph. The fifth
one, Hardik Pandya, who is basically considered an all-rounder, does twirl his
arms as a change bowler who too bowls in the range of 140 to 145 kmph. And yet,
curiously it was two of the genuine pacers who, coming good at wielding the
bat, put the Indian total in the second innings well beyond the capabilities of
the Proteas.
If
the quartet (Bhuwaneshwar Kumar, Ishant Sharma, Jaspreet Bumrah, Mohammed
Shami) continue to perform in the way they are doing, sharing all the twenty
wickets of the opposition in a match, they would seem to be putting the likes
Ravichandran Ashwin, Ravinder Jadeja, Kuldip Yaday and such other spinners of
the red cherry out of business. Remember, while Hardik Pandya did not get many
overs, another speed merchant, Umesh Yadav, the fastest of them all, was not
even played in any of the test matches in the series that just ended.
So, if the knowledgeable cricket commentators call
it the Golden Age of Indian Fast Bowling they wouldn’t be far off the mark. We
can only join them and wish may the tribe of Indian fast bowlers increase to make
the country a massive threat for other cricketing nations. Given that and the
kind of batting line-up that it has, India could remain numero uno in test
cricket for a long long time.
No comments:
Post a Comment